A Starting Point for Milford Casino Opponents
For the first time since the filing of a casino proposal, opponents met in Milford to begin organizing a campaign to defeat the project.
How do you fight a resort casino development of up to $1 billion? Beginning with small steps, and leading up to a larger campaign.
For the first time since the filing of a casino application for a site in Milford, near Interstate 495, opponents met at Milford Town Hall Monday and talked about how to get organized, grow in numbers, and influence local voters.
About 60 people attended the organizational meeting, spilling out of the meeting room into the hallway. Most attendees were from Holliston and Hopkinton, based on a show of hands. But as some of the participants pointed out, the meeting was not widely publicized.
"It's not that Milford people don't care," said Milford resident Beverly Swymer. "They didn't know about it. I'm sure more people will come forward."
The meeting was called together by Ken Rockett and other organizers of Casino Free Milford, a group that has drawn most of its members from the surrounding towns to Milford, including Holliston, which borders the proposed site. Only Milford residents will get a referendum vote on the project, if it gets to that point, which inspired several people to say the group needed to begin reaching out in Milford and reaching likely voters.
Joe Mastrangelo, of Holliston, said small business owners may assume, incorrectly, that they will get business from casino visitors. Casinos are designed to keep people inside them. "Nobody is going to leave the casino," he said. "They're not going to get a sandwich at Caffe Sorrento. Ain't going to happen."
Colorado-based developer David Nunes, working with Warner Gaming, submitted an application last month, one of three before the Massachusetts Gaming Commission proposed for the greater Boston region.
The Milford development, called Crossroads Massachusetts, would directly compete for the single available license for the region with two other applications in or near Boston: one at the Suffolk Downs site in East Boston, submitted by a group of eight partners, including Ceasars Entertainment Corp; and a resort casino proposed for a former industrial site in Everett, submitted by Wynn Resorts.
The state also will authorize up to one slots parlor, a resort-casino for the western Massachusetts, as well as up to one in southeastern region of the state.
Casino Free Milford operates a website, and a Facebook page, and its organizers have been in contact with Foxborough residents, who succeeded in building community opposition to a casino proposed last year in that town. The group members have already conducted some research into gathering facts and reports on casino impacts on surrounding communities, and on so-called secondary effects, such as crime and traffic increases.
Local opponents in Milford will need to build on the information, and conduct a campaign that is like any other political campaign, said John Seaver, a health care consultant and former selectman in Milford.
"You've got to keep your eyes on the ball," Seaver said. "Milford is the host community. This organization needs to take on a Milford face."
He pointed out that Milford is different than Foxborough politically; the battle will not be won here by voting out selectmen, he said, which is what happened in Foxborough. Three candidates that were anti-casino were voted on to the board of selectmen in that town, and they then refused to negotiate with the developer.
In Milford, one selectman, William Buckley, is opposed to a casino. Two others, Dino DeBartolomeis and Brian Murray, have said they want to wait and see what is proposed. Murray is running for re-election this spring, and as yet has no opponent. But Seaver told opponents, who started talking about putting forward a candidate to run against him, that it wasn't going to work.
"You are not going to defeat this selectman; forget about what Foxborough did," Seaver said.
Although he did not identify himself to the group, Murray attended the meeting. He said outside the room, after it ended, that he did not want to distract from the discussion. He said he still felt the concerns were premature, that he wasn't convinced the Nunes project would make it out of the first phase of state review, which involves an investigation into his and his partner's financing and past regulatory history.
Barry
6:42 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
I truly hope that if the citizens of Milford vote for the casino then all of these people opposed to it will have wasted their time. We can't alter the existing laws of Massachusetts when we want to unless we change the laws through a legal process. So to the neighboring towns who have no legal say in what Milford decides: tough!
Michael Soares
7:13 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
How will they build the casino when all the land is already owned by multiple private owners?
Danu
7:27 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Hopefully it will provide some good jobs.
Deb
8:13 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
I really wish the meeting had been better publicized - as a resident of Milford I definitely would have been there!
Deb
8:15 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Very strong feelings about the possibility of a casino here. I think it is sad when other towns that are also impacted are more pro-active than the people of this town.
Steve Ruddock
9:00 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
I wonder if they understand WHY crime goes up when casinos are introduced? It's because there are more people, more people equals more crime. for instance, Atlantic City has a super high crime rate, because it's based on the 39,000 residents and doesn't account for the near 30-million tourists that go through. Crime rates were halved in areas around Mohegan Sun and Foxwoods. Legitimate studies show that areas with casinos are just as safe as those without. A Casino would be great for the local economy. Stop trying to legislate my behavior, and stop believing every cherry-picked fact you hear people
Francis P. Ardito,Sr
4:04 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Steve, Atlantic City has an off season population as you point out. The warm months, Memorial Day through Labor Day show with summer residents to be close to a million. As to businesses, many restaurants near the casinos were forced to close due to lack of business. The casino owners were supposed to add money to Arctic avenue to revitalize the neighborhood. Guess what?, Arctic Ave. is still a slum. Most casino workers receive minimum wage. How do I know this? I went to school 25 miles away.
Ed Bertorelli
5:02 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Steve- Francis is right on and the same thing happened in CT where a study done by the state showed that restaurants within a 25 mile radius of casinos closed.
Dianna Vosburg
9:26 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
I live in Holliston and would be very much effected by a casino. The people who would be effected by a casino should have some say in its development. I am appalled that neighboring communities are barred from significant input, and I am amazed that the state thinks this is a good idea. My mother and sister live near the casinos in Connecticut and have nothing good to say about them. I share serious concerns with many about traffic, vice, social costs, and property values. Please take a look at actual studies and analysis on the effects of casinos in real communities; the only people who come out ahead are the developers.
Forkids
9:29 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
There is so much wrong with a casino here. Has anyone ever really looked at the areas surrounding the casinos in CT.? Those who can afford to will move OUT. Those who cannot afford to move will be stuck forever. Their houses will not sell. I could go on and on. It makes me ill every time I think of it.
Jim O'Connor
11:00 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
If they are sincere and if they believe in the free enterprise system, these casino opponents should just buy out the Warner Gaming investors..
Michael Soares
11:55 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
To those who oppose the casino here, I would like to see a detailed list of reasons why you oppose. For the record I'm a Milford resident who is currently neutral on the subject.
Jim
5:08 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013
Thanks for your logical request for information. I am a resident and oppose the casino based upon my independent research. Sorry I don't have the references with me at this location but here are some details. Unbiased studies have shown a number of detrimental impacts including: drop in property values, increased traffic and burden on infrastructure, crime, increased adolescent gambling and more. Unbiased studies include post-casino data from the town of Putnam, CT and another nearby town (again, sorry I don't have specifics with me). There is also a government study indicating that virtually all casinos during its study period were place in already depressed areas and that many commercial properties generally were lucky to hold value and residential properties did worse. The Milford proposal is unique in that it is in a totally residential area. This would make the impacts cited worse. Thanks for your point. Please Google for information and I think you will find that although there is a lot of controversy and conflicting data, the unbiased reports are largely negative. Good luck.
Steve Ruddock
5:27 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
So, every restaurant within 25 miles closed? Were they crap restaurants that were unable to compete with the restaurants at Foxwoods? It's funny I've heard that arguement before only it was 10 miles, but I still have yet to see this study. Who wrote the study (Focus on the Family does a lot of their own "scientific" research)? What were the variables?
I'm sure everyone reading this has been to Foxwoods or Mohegan Sun. Have you ever felt unsafe? Have you ever encountered traffic 5 miles away from the casino? have you driven past shuttered buildings?
As fas as AC, the place was a craphole before casinos, and it sounds like Francis was there a long time ago. Blaming casinos for AC's problems is like blaming drugs in Milford on recent immigrants. Casinos are not responsible for AC's issues. And why not mention succesful casinos that have been opened in PA, expanded gaming in Florida, and son. Of course there are craphole casinos, just like their are lousy restaurants and lousy hotels; the assumption that Milford will turn into AC and not Ledyard Connecticut or any of the other nice casinos across this country is shortsighted and biased.
Francis P. Ardito,Sr
7:36 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Steve, Your comment made about my Atlantic City visitation is an erroneous assumption. My 98 year old mother lives near AC. My son, Steven, lives in NJ also. We visit both yearly and partake in the casino buffets and bingo. The neighborhood still is run down. Corruption exists in AC politics and unionism. Also narcotics, gambling and prostitution.
Tony
5:46 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Wasn't well publicised??? Stories in the Patch and daily news aren't good enough for Milford residents to find out? , I don't think so. How about we did read and know about it but, wasn't interested in your meeting because we don't care about your single cause. I'm all for the Casino. Keeping beating your drums and I'll show up at the next meeting with some friends who are all for it as well. In fact I will write a ltter to the Milford board tomorrow supporting the proposal.
Deborah
8:04 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Most residents are or will be opposed to the casino. We just need to pull together.
Myd Nevins
8:19 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Careful when one group claims to speak for everyone. That's not always the case. Seems to me that the proponents of the casino are quietly there and just less annoying.
Ray Fellows
8:05 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Before I moved here 20 years ago I lived in Upstate NY. Two Indian tribes built casinos their, extolling all the virtues that the casinos would bring to the area. More jobs, businesses would prosper, more revenue to the area. NONE of that happened. Just more crime and traffic congestion, trash, higher taxes for town services. The casinos bring all the employees in from around the country, the only thing they hire locally is the cleaning crew.
Its a sham, the only people that are going tomake money is the casino operators.
This is not my opinion, its a fact that I have lived through. This is a horrible idea that will ruin Milford and the surrounding area. If you HAVE to have a casino in Massachusetts, put it in the western side of the state that is rural. You think we have a traffic problem now?
Myd Nevins
8:34 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Ray, you know I always respect your insights, but I would make the argument that 20 years ago is essentially that... 20 years ago.
I'm still neutral on the possibility of a casino but people seem to be preaching that the town will become a post-apocalyptic Thunderdome if its built which makes it hard for me to take them serious.
Ray Fellows
8:08 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Just read the comments about Atlantic City. You take your life into your own hands just leaving the casino! What a dump and awash with poverty, decay, drugs, prostitution. All the things that gambling brings with it.
Not a nice place to visit, much less live in.
Myd Nevins
8:37 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
I would be interested in hearing the Milford Police's (not some local know-it-all) official stance on how well they could handle it and what strain it would take on their department and resources.
x
10:41 am on Wednesday, February 6, 2013
The huge increase in traffic and crime is not worth the low paying service jobs and a small uptick in the local economy. Also, the stress on town resources, (police, fire & EMS) etc. We are better off if they built an industrial park that would provide good jobs and long term economic growth. This would be less of an impact on the town and surrounding communities.
Barry
10:46 am on Wednesday, February 6, 2013
If you have problems with a casino in Milford and if you are a resident of Milford then vote against it. That is your right. Similarly, if you are not a Milford resident, too bad. The laws of Massachusetts do not allow - thankfully - residents from other towns to have a say. (Otherwise absolutely nothing would get done including issues other than casinos.)
Ray Fellows
5:12 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013
I am a Milford resident and I thank everyone for the input. I have now decided I need to join the opposition to this initiative because it looks like some people actually think its a good thing. Even the possibility of this happening scares me.
Mary MacDonald
5:26 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013
Myd, at this point, the proposal is in Phase I of the application process, this is to allow the state to look into the finances of the applicant (Nunes and Warner Gaming), their regulatory history, etc... The location-specific part of the application comes in Phase II, so there is no plan right now for folks to evaluate. And I called yesterday to ask when the Phase I application will be made public, and it's not yet. They have started conducting a background investigation into the applicant, it could take several months.
Myd Nevins
6:07 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013
Thank you Mary. I guess we can hold off from the warnings of impending doom for awhile. :)